Get in Touch
Tell us about yourself and we will get back to you as soon as we can.
Tell us about yourself and we will get back to you as soon as we can.
.webp)
The average burn rate for startups is one of the most searched financial questions among founders and small business operators. Yet the answers online are often incomplete.
Most benchmark discussions focus on venture-backed tech companies. That leaves out a large segment of startups and small to medium businesses that are scaling through revenue, loans, or hybrid funding structures.
Burn rate is not about industry alone. It is about stage, team size, cost structure, and growth ambition.
A software startup, a consulting firm, and a healthcare services company with 12 employees may have nearly identical burn rates despite operating in completely different markets.
This guide provides a stage-based, universally applicable framework to understand:
The goal is not just to define burn rate. It is to help you control it.
Burn rate is the amount of cash a business spends each month beyond what it earns.
If expenses exceed revenue, the difference is burn.
Example:
Burn rate determines how long your company can survive before running out of cash.
It is a liquidity metric, not a profitability metric.
Understanding the distinction matters.
Gross burn is total monthly operating expenses.
Includes:
It does not consider revenue.
Net burn subtracts revenue from expenses.
Formula:
Net Burn = Total Expenses - Total Revenue
Net burn is the number that determines runway.
.webp)
Burn rate varies more by stage than by industry.
Typical burn: $10,000 to $80,000 per month
Profile:
Primary goal: validation.
Burn depends heavily on founder compensation and outsourcing choices.
Typical burn: $40,000 to $200,000 per month
Profile:
Primary goal: achieving consistent revenue growth.
This is where burn risk increases due to hiring expansion.
Typical burn: $150,000 to $600,000+ per month
Profile:
Primary goal: accelerating growth.
Burn becomes intentional. The company is spending ahead of revenue.
Typical temporary burn during growth push: $50,000 to $250,000 per month
Profile:
Unlike early startups, these companies often return to breakeven after expansion stabilizes.
Industry matters, but these factors matter more:
Payroll usually accounts for 60 to 75 percent of burn.
Hiring is the primary burn accelerator.
Customer acquisition strategy dramatically changes burn:
High fixed costs increase burn rigidity.
Examples:
Unpredictable revenue increases net burn volatility.
Recurring revenue businesses often manage burn more predictably.
Aggressive growth strategies intentionally increase burn.
Burn is not always a mistake. It can be strategic.
Example:
Net Burn = $180,000 - $120,000 = $60,000
Formula :
Runway = Cash on Hand / Net Burn
Example:
Runway = $900,000/ $60,000 = 15 Months
Healthy runway benchmark: 12 to 18 months.
These terms are often confused but measure different things:
Definition: The rate at which you spend cash monthly
Measured in: Dollars per month
Example: $80,000 per month
What it tells you: How fast you’re consuming resources
Definition: How long your cash will last at current burn rate
Measured in: Months
Example: 14 months
What it tells you: Time until you run out of money
Burn rate and runway are inversely related:
Lower burn rate leads to Longer runway (at same cash level)
Higher cash balance leads to Longer runway (at same burn rate)
Burn rate helps you:
Identify where cash is going
Benchmark against similar companies
Find areas to optimize spending
Runway helps you:
Plan fundraising timeline
Make strategic hiring decisions
Assess survival risk
Key insight: You can extend runway by either reducing burn rate OR raising more capital. Most startups need to do both strategically.
Use this 5-part framework to evaluate whether your burn is appropriate.
Is runway above 12 months?
If below 9 months, risk increases significantly.
Calculate:
Burn Multiple = Net Burn / Net New Revenue
Is headcount growth exceeding revenue growth?
Over-hiring is the most common burn misstep.
Model cash flow under:
Burn should be stress-tested.
Are you planning to raise capital with at least 9 months of runway remaining?
Late fundraising increases dilution risk.
Note: Runway targets increase at scaling stage because fundraising takes longer and requires more lead time.
Stage alignment is more important than industry comparison.
Here are the critical red flags that your burn rate has become dangerous:
Why it matters: Fundraising typically takes 6-9 months from first contact to closed round. If you’re below 9 months and haven’t started raising, you’re in the danger zone.
Action needed: Immediately begin fundraising OR implement cost reductions to extend runway to 12+ months.
Why it matters: This means you’re spending $3+ for every $1 of new revenue. Unless you’re in a land-grab market, this is unsustainable.
Calculation: If you add $50K in new monthly recurring revenue but burn $180K, your burn multiple is 3.6x.
Action needed: Analyze unit economics. Either improve revenue efficiency or reduce marketing/sales spend.
Why it matters: People are your largest expense. If revenue growth is 20% but headcount is growing 40%, burn will accelerate dangerously.
Red flag example: You had 15 people at $500K ARR. Now you have 25 people at $700K ARR. Headcount grew 67% while revenue grew 40%.
Action needed: Freeze non-critical hires. Ensure new hires directly support revenue growth.
Why it matters: This indicates fundamental business model issues. You’re spending more to achieve the same or worse results.
Example: Last quarter burn was $120K with $80K revenue. This quarter burn is $150K with $75K revenue.
Action needed: Deep strategic review needed. Something is broken in your growth engine.
Why it matters: If you can’t articulate how you’ll become profitable OR how you’ll raise the next round, you’re operating without a viable strategy.
Standard advice says “reduce burn.” That is not always correct.
Reducing burn may fail when:
In these cases, higher burn can be rational if runway supports it.
The key question is not “Is burn high?”
It is “Is burn aligned with strategy and capital?”
Cutting burn doesn’t have to mean killing momentum. Here’s how to reduce expenses strategically:
Don’t: Cut all marketing.
Do: Analyze ROI by channel. Double down on high-performing channels, eliminate low performers.
Example: If LinkedIn ads have 8-month CAC payback but Google Ads have 20-month payback, redirect Google budget to LinkedIn.
Targets:
Potential savings: 15-30% of operational costs
Approach: Replace full-time hires in non-core functions with fractional executives or contractors.
Examples:
Savings: 40-60% cost reduction in these functions
Keep hiring: Sales, customer success, engineering (if product-led growth)
Freeze hiring: Operations, HR, administrative support
Impact: Slows burn growth without stopping revenue growth
Savings: $500-$1,500 per employee monthly
Considerations: Only works if team is already partially remote and productivity won’t suffer.
Approach: Negotiate Net 60 or Net 90 terms instead of Net 30.
Impact: Doesn’t reduce burn but extends runway by improving cash flow timing.
Tactics:
Impact: Improves cash position, reduces net burn if revenue timing improves.
Keep: Health insurance, core productivity tools, professional development that drives revenue skills
Consider cutting: Catered meals, unlimited PTO policies that aren’t used, expensive team offsites, premium office amenities
Actions:
Example savings: $5K-$20K monthly for typical Series A company
Avoid cutting:
The key principle: Cut overhead and inefficiency, not growth drivers.
Managing burn rate requires structured visibility, not reactive cost cutting.
LayerNext supports startups and small to medium businesses that need clarity around cash flow, forecasting, and capital planning. It is designed for leadership teams navigating growth decisions, hiring plans, and funding timelines.
Rather than focusing only on bookkeeping, LayerNext helps businesses align spending with strategic milestones. Founders gain forward-looking insight into runway sensitivity, burn scenarios, and expansion timing.
It is particularly valuable for:
LayerNext is the right fit when growth is intentional and capital must be managed with precision.
Burn rate strategy is not about minimizing spend. It is about controlling it with intelligence.
