Stampli vs LayerNext

Automation That Fits Your Finance Stack

Pricing & Features Comparison

Quick Answer

Stampli connects to ERPs it has already built a connector for, through API, bridge apps, or file sync. LayerNext connects the same way when an API exists, and through a computer-use agent when it does not. LayerNext also carries each invoice through ERP posting and bank reconciliation, then reports on it. Stampli's scope is AP and procure-to-pay.

Pricing Comparison

Two fundamentally different approaches to access and pricing.

‍

Custom Pricing

Unlimited entities, locations, vendors

Procurement, Direct Pay, Stampli Card, vendor management

Automated invoice capture, 2-3 way PO matching

Dedicated Customer Success Manager

12 pre-built reports, interactive dashboards

Logo LayerNext
Pro
$299/month‍

AP automation for QuickBooks

Invoice and receipt capture

Bank reconciliation

Human approval before posting

Standard workflows

Enterprise
Custom

Everything in Pro, plus

AP automation on any ERP

Invoice and statement reconciliation

Bank reconciliation at scale

Two and three way PO matching

Direct posting to any ERP

Financial reporting and anomaly alerts

Audit trail, SSO and permissions

White-glove support with SLA

‍

‍

Feature Comparison

Stampli covers AP well on ERPs it already supports. The gap opens at connector dependency and platform scope.

Feature

Logo LayerNext

Custom or in-house ERP

Stampli

LayerNext

Single cloud portal for all automations

Stampli

LayerNext

Dedicated enterprise portal with Insight Board

Bank reconciliation

Stampli

LayerNext

Real-time, continuous

CFO reporting

Stampli

LayerNext

Real-time dashboard

Legacy or desktop ERP, no API

Stampli

Partial. File sync only

LayerNext

Multi-channel data input (email, disk, ERP, DB)

Stampli

Standard capture only

LayerNext

AI invoice capture

Stampli

Billy AI

LayerNext

Any format

PO matching

Stampli

2-way, 3-way, partial POs

LayerNext

Automated, flags mismatches

Approval workflows

Stampli

Multi-level, invoice comment threads

LayerNext

Plain-English rules, mobile approval

Duplicate detection

Stampli

LayerNext

Modern cloud ERP

Stampli

Native API

LayerNext

Native API

Multi-entity, multi-currency

Stampli

LayerNext

Business rules

Stampli

AI GL coding

LayerNext

Plain-English, thousands supported

Custom workflow configuration (no code)

Stampli

Available

LayerNext

Zero-code, any automation type

Human-in-the-loop review

Stampli

LayerNext

Full audit trail / SOX readiness

Stampli

100% lineage

LayerNext

Full audit trails

Reporting

Stampli

12 pre-built reports

LayerNext

Insight Board

Mobile App

Stampli

LayerNext

iOS and Android

All Features

Stampli

Stampli

LayerNext

LayerNext

The Question

Does your ERP have an API? If yes, both platforms are worth evaluating based on scope. If no, LayerNext is the only option. Stampli requires API access to connect to any system.

‍

LayerNext: AI Finance Operations for Any ERP

LayerNext deploys AI agents that automate the full finance operation, not just AP. Agents capture invoices, reconcile bank feeds, close books continuously, enter data into ERP systems, and surface CFO-level financial intelligence. The platform connects natively through an API where one exists, and operates the ERP's own screen through a computer-use agent where it does not.

‍

90 - 165

Hours saved per month finance teams

90 - 100%

Reduction in processing errors

95%+

Task accuracy on defined workflows

Weeks

To deploy, not months

‍

What LayerNext does

  • Any automation is configured by designing a sequence of steps. No development cycles, no waiting on IT.
  • Entity-wise business rules are written in plain English and retrieved by an indexed search tree, accurate even across thousands of active rules.
  • Every invoice is captured, matched to its purchase order, and routed for approval automatically.
  • Agents operate a legacy or desktop ERP's own screen the way a person would. No API setup, no bridge app, no file-sync configuration.
  • Data is pulled from a dedicated email address, a disk-based bot, a computer-use agent, direct SQL databases, cloud storage, and API where available.
  • Each enterprise gets a dedicated portal with an Insight Board tracking what is processed, pending, and waiting on a human.
  • Posted transactions are matched against bank feeds as they arrive, so month end becomes a review.
  • Cash position, burn rate, runway, and margin analysis stay current to today, not to last month.

‍

‍

‍

PO and AP automation solution has allowed us to standardize workflows across multiple companies, improve approval controls, increase visibility into outstanding commitments, and reduce the administrative burden on our finance teams.

Ivan Cruz

VP of Finance, CHB Group

‍

‍

Stampli: AP Automation for ERP-Integrated Teams

Stampli is a procure-to-pay platform built around invoice-centric collaboration, connecting to 70+ ERPs through API, bridge, and file integrations.

‍

What Stampli does

  • Any automation is configured by designing a sequence of steps. No development cycles, no waiting on IT.
  • Entity-wise business rules are written in plain English and retrieved by an indexed search tree, accurate even across thousands of active rules.
  • Every invoice is captured, matched to its purchase order, and routed for approval automatically.
  • Agents operate a legacy or desktop ERP's own screen the way a person would. No API setup, no bridge app, no file-sync configuration.
  • Data is pulled from a dedicated email address, a disk-based bot, a computer-use agent, direct SQL databases, cloud storage, and API where available.
  • Each enterprise gets a dedicated portal with an Insight Board tracking what is processed, pending, and waiting on a human.
  • Posted transactions are matched against bank feeds as they arrive, so month end becomes a review.
  • Cash position, burn rate, runway, and margin analysis stay current to today, not to last month.

‍

‍

What Gets Replaced and What It Costs

For Stampli, the question is how much faster invoices clear approval. For LayerNext, the question is how many people are still doing this by hand.

‍

Current State

With LayerNext

Staff cost

6 clerks x $55K = $330,000/yr

LayerNext enterprise:
$25,000–$100,000/yr, based on workflow complexity and transaction volume

Invoice processing time

15–30 minutes per invoice, manually

Seconds. End-to-end automated.

ERP data entry

Manual, clerk-dependent, error-prone

Automated via computer-use agent

Books current as of

End of last month, at best

Real-time, always closed

CFO visibility

Report delivered 2 weeks after month-end

Live dashboard, updated continuously

$230,000 – $305,000

Net annual saving after LayerNext cost. Payback period: under 90 days.

Who Should Use Each Platform?

‍

Choose

If you,

Have staff doing manual AP, data entry, or reconciliation a connector cannot reach

Want payments (ACH, check, wire, virtual card), a corporate card, and procurement bundled in the same platform as AP

Require SOX-grade audit trail for Big Four audits

Have AP as the only workflow to automate, with no reconciliation or reporting need

Choose

Logo LayerNext

If you,

Run any ERP environment: modern cloud (NetSuite, Workday, SAP), legacy desktop with no API (Epicor, older Sage, Dynamics GP), or a mix of both

Need to automate AP invoice processing at volume: 500+ invoices per month

Need real-time burn rate, runway, and cash flow visibility

Want transparent pricing and a pilot before committing

Are a US or Canadian business wanting local support

Need custom workflows, business rules, multi-channel data input, and full AP automation across any ERP, cloud or legacy

1. What is the core difference between Stampli and LayerNext?

Stampli automates AP and procure-to-pay on ERPs it has a pre-built connector for. LayerNext matches that API coverage on modern ERPs, then extends to legacy and custom systems with no API. It also carries each invoice through ERP posting and bank reconciliation, with CFO reporting on top.

2. Does Stampli work with legacy ERPs that have no API?

Partially. Stampli has bridge integrations for a handful of on-prem systems, including SAP ECC and Sage 100, and file-based integrations for a few more, including Epicor and Sage 300. These require setup per system and do not offer the same live, two-way sync as its API integrations. Systems outside that list are not supported.

3. Does LayerNext require coding to set up workflows or business rules?

No. Workflows and business rules are configured by the finance team in plain English, with no developer and no build cycle.

4. How quickly can each platform be deployed?

Stampli cites a 0.8-month average go-live on ERPs it already supports, covering AP only. LayerNext runs a phased rollout across AP and reconciliation together: discovery in weeks 1 to 2, a pilot in weeks 3 to 6, full deployment by weeks 7 to 12, with no ERP migration required.

5. Does a human still review what the AI does?

Yes. LayerNext works exception based. Routine invoices post automatically, and anything ambiguous, like a tax mismatch or a missing PO, creates a task for a person to resolve. When the task queue is empty, no human input is currently needed.

6. Is my financial data secure?

LayerNext encrypts data in transit and at rest, applies strict access controls, and never uses customer financial data to train its models. Bank connections run through Plaid, and security practices are SOC 2 aligned.

7. Do I need to involve my IT team to set this up?

Very little. LayerNext needs no ERP migration, no middleware, and no changes to existing infrastructure, and the finance team writes workflows and rules in plain English without IT tickets. Access to your specific ERP is scoped during discovery in weeks 1 to 2.

8. What ERPs does LayerNext support?

Active integrations: QuickBooks Online, QuickBooks Desktop, Xero, Sage, Microsoft Dynamics 365, NetSuite, SAP, FreshBooks, and Excel-based workflows. For systems without modern APIs, including legacy Sage, Epicor, older Dynamics, and custom Windows ERPs, LayerNext uses computer-use automation to operate at the application layer without API access.

‍

Why teams choose LayerNext over Stampli

‍

Stampli is a real option for one specific case: a team already on a supported ERP whose main friction is approval routing, and who wants payments and procurement in the same tool as AP.

‍

The gap opens in two places. Every Stampli connector, API, bridge, or file, still requires Stampli to have built support for a specific system, and legacy or custom ERPs get partial coverage at best. And Stampli stops at AP. Bank reconciliation and CFO reporting live elsewhere.

‍

LayerNext matches Stampli's reach on every ERP Stampli supports, over the same API, then continues where Stampli stops. Computer-use automation means the agent operates a connector-less ERP the same way a finance clerk does. A zero-code workflow engine and plain-English business rules mean the finance team owns the automation. The ROI case is direct: 6 to 8 data entry clerks at $55K each, replaced by a platform that costs $25K to $100K a year.

‍

If your ERP is supported, your pain is AP-specific, and you want payments and procurement in the same tool, evaluate Stampli. If your ERP has no API, your team needs more than AP solved, or you want to try the product before a sales call, LayerNext is built for that.

‍

See LayerNext in Your Actual Environment

Send us your 50 messiest invoices. We will show you what automation looks like inside your ERP, legacy or modern, with no infrastructure changes required.

Start for free